Meet the language learners regarding the subject-verb agreement from the point of view In some cases, the agreement follows the number of the name closest to the verb. This is called the approximation rule. This rule applies to subjects that contain the following words: Compared to English, Latin is an example of a strongly curved language. The consequences of an agreement are: let`s now see how the subject-verb agreement works. Although it is quite easy to approve the English verb with the subject, complex topics can sometimes create problems with the chord by theme. Also keep in mind the agreement that has been shown to be also in the subjunctive mind. The only complications are the personal pronouns “you” and “me.” “I” is a singular pronoun and “you” can be singular or plural depending on the context. But they follow the same rule of subject-verb agreement as plural subjects. [This sounds very simple, but could be difficult for native speakers of languages in which the subject-verb chord means exactly that the verb and subject carry the same morphs!] The subject-verb agreement (SVA) is considered one of the most difficult structures for learners who acquire a foreign language. The difficulties faced by L2 learners with regard to ASA can be attributed to the complexity of the morphology of specific bending in some languages. However, English has an extremely bad folding system, which is governed by a simple SVA rule: the verb gets suffix-s if the subject is singular in the third person. Despite the apparent clarity and simplicity of the rule, learners with a wide range of first languages are having difficulty acquiring the 3rd person Singular suffix – s.

For even more exercise, here`s an interactive quiz topic. Languages cannot have a conventional agreement at all, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. Case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only personal pronouns and pronouns with a case mark). The correspondence between these pronouns can sometimes be observed: In English, defective verbs usually show no match for the person or number, they contain modal verbs: can, can, wants, wants, should, should, should. The author of this article believes that learners have the compliance category, but may have difficulty linking functionality to the appropriate morphology if necessary. There are valid results for this approach. Numerous studies [Zobl, Liceras, 1994; Lardiere, 1999; Ionine, Wexler, 2002] have shown that L2 learners use flexible bending – the use of copula and aid forms more accurately and at a significantly higher rate than the Affix intule. These results allow us to conclude that a mechanism of agreement cannot be compromised, because L2 learners have mastered the flexible agreement paradigm before installation.

If there was a place for disabilities of the entire category, then learners would not have shown a high accuracy rate with performance on Copula and help.